NABANITA MAITY AND 3 OTHERS vs BAJAJ ALLLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD — 253/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 01-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M A C C - M.A.C.C

CNR: WBEM090025122025

Filing Number

1647/2025

Filing Date

15-Nov-2025

Registration No

253/2025

Registration Date

15-Nov-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur

Judge

1-ADJ I

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NABANITA MAITY AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. SUSANTA MAITY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ ALLLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ I

  3. 15-Nov-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Contai allowed the petition filed by Nabanita Maity and 3 others against Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. under Section 166 of the M.V. Act, claiming Rs. 30,00,000 in compensation. The court permitted the claimants to pay the M.A.C.C. fees later, subject to payment before the preliminary hearing, and approved their application under M.V. Rule 331(2). The case has been fixed for settlement/review and adjournment on 09.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 253/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Contai allowed the petition filed by Nabanita Maity and 3 others against Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. under Section 166 of the M.V. Act, claiming Rs. 30,00,000 in compensation. The court permitted the claimants to pay the M.A.C.C. fees later, subject to payment before the preliminary hearing, and approved their application under M.V. Rule 331(2). The case has been fixed for settlement/review and adjournment on 09.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case