State of West Bengal vs Unknown — 70/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,238,61(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th May 2026 Date Not Updated.
Sessions Trial
CNR: WBEM090023442025
Filing Number
871/2025
Filing Date
29-Oct-2025
Registration No
70/2026
Registration Date
29-Oct-2025
Court
Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur
Judge
1-ADJ I
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
509
Police Station
PURBA MEDINIPUR RAMNAGAR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Unknown
Case History
-
16-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-May-2026
Evidence
ADJ I
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
ADJ I
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
ADJ I
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
ADJ I
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
ADJ I
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
ADJ I
-
28-Jan-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary of Sessions Case No. 574 of 2025: The court ordered that the accused child in conflict with law (CCL) be tried as an adult offender under Section 19 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, finding sufficient evidence of his significant role in a heinous offense under BNS Sections 103/238/61(2). The bail application was rejected, with the court citing the gravity of the offense and risk of the accused mingling with habitual offenders. The case was adjourned to 11-02-2026 for consideration of charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ I
-
02-Jan-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ I
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ I
-
11-Dec-2025
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ I
-
28-Nov-2025
Appearance
ADJ I
-
15-Nov-2025
Appearance
ADJ I
-
31-Oct-2025
Appearance
ADJ I
-
29-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 70/2026
Summary of Sessions Case No. 574 of 2025: The court ordered that the accused child in conflict with law (CCL) be tried as an adult offender under Section 19 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, finding sufficient evidence of his significant role in a heinous offense under BNS Sections 103/238/61(2). The bail application was rejected, with the court citing the gravity of the offense and risk of the accused mingling with habitual offenders. The case was adjourned to 11-02-2026 for consideration of charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts