State of West Bengal vs Ansarul Saha ALIAS Kala and 03 Others — 408/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238(a),61(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Sessions Trial

CNR: WBEM090021082025

Evidence

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

783/2025

Filing Date

09-09-2025

Registration No

408/2025

Registration Date

09-09-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur

Judge

4-Addl District and Sessions Judge FTC II

FIR Details

FIR Number

189

Police Station

PURBA MEDINIPUR RAMNAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238(a),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

Ansarul Saha ALIAS Kala and 03 Others

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Addl District and Sessions Judge FTC II

30-03-2026

Evidence

24-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

28-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

26-11-2025
Copy of Order
24-03-2026
Copy of Order
24-03-2026
Copy of Order

In case S.T.-408 of 2025, the court held an evidence hearing where witness P.W.-2 (Gunasindhu Sahoo) was examined in chief, and various documents and electronic evidence were marked as exhibits. The case was adjourned to 30.03.2026 for further examination of the witness and production of the four custody accused persons, with one accused remanded to judicial custody. Additionally, a petition to preserve electronic evidence (pendrive) was allowed and the pendrive was ordered to be kept in safe custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In case S.T.-408 of 2025, the court held an evidence hearing where witness P.W.-2 (Gunasindhu Sahoo) was examined in chief, and various documents and electronic evidence were marked as exhibits. The case was adjourned to 30.03.2026 for further examination of the witness and production of the four custody accused persons, with one accused remanded to judicial custody. Additionally, a petition to preserve electronic evidence (pendrive) was allowed and the pendrive was ordered to be kept in safe custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case