SMT KAKALI DAS vs DIPAK DAS — 961/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(B). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED ON CONSENT on 17th April 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBEM090020892025
Filing Number
1348/2025
Filing Date
09-Sep-2025
Registration No
961/2025
Registration Date
09-Sep-2025
Court
Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED ON CONSENT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT KAKALI DAS
Adv. ANIRBAN CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIPAK DAS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case 961/2025 Summary: The Additional District Judge, Contai granted a mutual consent divorce decree dissolving the marriage between Smt. Kakali Das and Shri Dipak Das, solemnized on 12-11-2011. The court found the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to temperamental differences and incompatibility, with the parties separated since 01-04-2024 and no possibility of reconciliation. All statutory requirements under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 were satisfied, including the six-month waiting period and absence of collusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ I
-
09-Sep-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 961/2025
Case 961/2025 Summary: The Additional District Judge, Contai granted a mutual consent divorce decree dissolving the marriage between Smt. Kakali Das and Shri Dipak Das, solemnized on 12-11-2011. The court found the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to temperamental differences and incompatibility, with the parties separated since 01-04-2024 and no possibility of reconciliation. All statutory requirements under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 were satisfied, including the six-month waiting period and absence of collusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts