State of West Bengal vs Biplab Panda — 521/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),117(2),74. Status: Charge / Plea Hearing. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Charge / Plea Hearing Next hearing 06-May-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: WBEM090020632025

Filing Number

766/2025

Filing Date

06-Sep-2025

Registration No

521/2025

Registration Date

06-Sep-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur

Judge

1-ADJ I

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

681

Police Station

PURBA MEDINIPUR EGRA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),117(2),74
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Biplab Panda

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ I

  3. 27-Jan-2026

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ I

  4. 24-Nov-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ I

  5. 12-Sep-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: Bail was granted to accused Biplab Panda in SC No. 521 of 2025 (POCSO case). The court found insufficient prima facie evidence of POCSO Act offence, noting allegations of indecent signals lacked supporting materials and the conduct would at best attract JJ Act offence. Bail conditions include furnishing Rs. 6,000 bond with two sureties of Rs. 3,000 each, and restrictions against contacting victims/witnesses or tampering with evidence until investigation completion by 24-11-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 12-Sep-2025

    Report

    ADJ I

  7. 06-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 521/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail was granted to accused Biplab Panda in SC No. 521 of 2025 (POCSO case). The court found insufficient prima facie evidence of POCSO Act offence, noting allegations of indecent signals lacked supporting materials and the conduct would at best attract JJ Act offence. Bail conditions include furnishing Rs. 6,000 bond with two sureties of Rs. 3,000 each, and restrictions against contacting victims/witnesses or tampering with evidence until investigation completion by 24-11-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case