Saiyum Khan vs Sk. Aisuddin — 24/2025

Case under West Bengal Land Reforms Act Section 9. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 17-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Misc. Appeal

CNR: WBEM090018342025

Filing Number

1190/2025

Filing Date

11-Aug-2025

Registration No

24/2025

Registration Date

11-Aug-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur

Judge

2-ADJ II

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Land Reforms Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saiyum Khan

    Adv. SYED SHAMIM KAWSER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sk. Aisuddin

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    ADJ II

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    ADJ II

  4. 23-Dec-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court granted an interim stay of Execution Case No.16 of 2025 until 22.01.2026, recalling the warrant of possession issued by the executing court. The appeal involves a legal question on whether oral heba (gift under Muhammadan law) reduced to writing requires mandatory registration, with the court finding merit in the appellant's arguments based on Supreme Court precedent. The stay was ordered to prevent prejudice to the appeal proceedings and allow both parties to be heard before possession is executed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    ADJ II

  6. 03-Nov-2025

    Steps

    ADJ II

  7. 12-Aug-2025

    Steps

    ADJ II

  8. 11-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 24/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted an interim stay of Execution Case No.16 of 2025 until 22.01.2026, recalling the warrant of possession issued by the executing court. The appeal involves a legal question on whether oral heba (gift under Muhammadan law) reduced to writing requires mandatory registration, with the court finding merit in the appellant's arguments based on Supreme Court precedent. The stay was ordered to prevent prejudice to the appeal proceedings and allow both parties to be heard before possession is executed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case