AJIDA BIBI AND OTHERS vs BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INS. CO. LTD — 132/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M A C C - M.A.C.C

CNR: WBEM090012732025

Filing Number

834/2025

Filing Date

11-Jun-2025

Registration No

132/2025

Registration Date

11-Jun-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur

Judge

1-ADJ I

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJIDA BIBI AND OTHERS

    Adv. SUSANTA MAITY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INS. CO. LTD

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ I

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ I

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ I

  5. 01-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  6. 11-Jun-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: MAC 132/2025 Ajida Bibi and 3 others filed a motor accident compensation claim under Section 166 of the M.V. Act against Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. for Rs. 25,00,000. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the claimants' prayer to pay tribunal fees later, conditioned on payment before the preliminary hearing. The application under Section 331(2) of the M.V. Rules, 1989 was also allowed. The case is adjourned to 01.09.2025 for settlement/reply and additional directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 11-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 132/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MAC 132/2025 Ajida Bibi and 3 others filed a motor accident compensation claim under Section 166 of the M.V. Act against Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. for Rs. 25,00,000. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the claimants' prayer to pay tribunal fees later, conditioned on payment before the preliminary hearing. The application under Section 331(2) of the M.V. Rules, 1989 was also allowed. The case is adjourned to 01.09.2025 for settlement/reply and additional directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case