SMT TITHI CHOWDHURY vs HEMANTA CHOWDHURY — 443/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1)(ia)(ib). Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN EXPARTE on 12th March 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBEM090009832025
Filing Number
637/2025
Filing Date
03-05-2025
Registration No
443/2025
Registration Date
03-05-2025
Court
Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur
Judge
4-Addl District and Sessions Judge FTC II
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED IN EXPARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT TITHI CHOWDHURY
Adv. ASIM KUMAR CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
HEMANTA CHOWDHURY
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl District and Sessions Judge FTC II
Disposed
Exparte Hearing
Exparte Hearing
Exparte Hearing
Show Cause
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | Exparte Hearing |
| 18-02-2026 | Exparte Hearing |
| 06-02-2026 | Exparte Hearing |
| 15-01-2026 | Show Cause |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Mat Suit 443/2025 (Tithi Chowdhury v. Hemanta Chowdhury) The court granted an ex-parte divorce decree dissolving the marriage solemnized on 20/07/2020 between Smt. Tithi Chowdhury Ojha and Sri Hemanta Chowdhury under sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner proved that the respondent and his family tortured her both physically and mentally for inadequate dowry, eventually driving her out on 25/02/2023, establishing grounds for cruelty and desertion. The respondent did not contest the suit, and the unchallenged evidence of the petitioner and her witness substantiated the claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Mat Suit 443/2025 (Tithi Chowdhury v. Hemanta Chowdhury) The court granted an ex-parte divorce decree dissolving the marriage solemnized on 20/07/2020 between Smt. Tithi Chowdhury Ojha and Sri Hemanta Chowdhury under sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner proved that the respondent and his family tortured her both physically and mentally for inadequate dowry, eventually driving her out on 25/02/2023, establishing grounds for cruelty and desertion. The respondent did not contest the suit, and the unchallenged evidence of the petitioner and her witness substantiated the claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts