State Gov vs 1.REYAJUDDIN ALI @ SK.KALA — 60/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,506,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th March 2026 Date Not Updated.

Evidence Next hearing 09-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Trial

CNR: WBEM090009222024

Filing Number

297/2024

Filing Date

09-Apr-2024

Registration No

60/2025

Registration Date

09-Apr-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur

Judge

2-ADJ II

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

231

Police Station

PURBA MEDINIPUR POTASHPUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Gov

    Adv. P.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.1.REYAJUDDIN ALI @ SK.KALA

Case History

  1. 09-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ II

  3. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ II

  4. 03-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    ADJ I

  5. 11-Jul-2024

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: Five of six accused persons (Riajuddin Ali, Mamtaj Bibi, Rahima Bibi, Sk. Raju, and Sk Fulima Bibi) were permitted to remain on their previous bail bonds. The sixth accused, Sk. Fayjuddin, was absent without valid reason despite prior absences, and his bail was rejected; a warrant of arrest (W/A) was issued against him and proceedings initiated against his surety under Section 446 CrPC. The case is adjourned to 03-01-2025 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 11-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    ADJ I

  7. 21-May-2024

    Appearance

    ADJ I

  8. 16-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Five of six accused persons (Riajuddin Ali, Mamtaj Bibi, Rahima Bibi, Sk. Raju, and Sk Fulima Bibi) were permitted to remain on their previous bail bonds. The sixth accused, Sk. Fayjuddin, was absent without valid reason despite prior absences, and his bail was rejected; a warrant of arrest (W/A) was issued against him and proceedings initiated against his surety under Section 446 CrPC. The case is adjourned to 03-01-2025 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case