Ujjaldeb Barman vs State of West Bengal — 55/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),69,89,318(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBEM090005852026

Filing Number

213/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur

Judge

1-ADJ I

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

PURBA MEDINIPUR BHAGAWANPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),69,89,318(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ujjaldeb Barman

    Adv. ASIM KUMAR CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Ujjaldeb Barman in a case involving charges under BNS sections 316(2)/69/89/318(4) (relating to cheating and criminal intimidation). The court found that while serious allegations were made (including cheating regarding marriage and compelling medical procedures), the prosecution could not produce supporting documents and the complainant refused medico-legal examination; the court determined the incidents appeared consensual and noted the chargesheet was already filed, making further detention unnecessary. Barman was enlarged on bail with a Rs. 10,000 bond and two sureties of Rs. 5,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Ujjaldeb Barman in a case involving charges under BNS sections 316(2)/69/89/318(4) (relating to cheating and criminal intimidation). The court found that while serious allegations were made (including cheating regarding marriage and compelling medical procedures), the prosecution could not produce supporting documents and the complainant refused medico-legal examination; the court determined the incidents appeared consensual and noted the chargesheet was already filed, making further detention unnecessary. Barman was enlarged on bail with a Rs. 10,000 bond and two sureties of Rs. 5,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case