SMT ANJALI JANA MAL vs BISWAJIT MAL — 84/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1)(ia). Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN EXPARTE on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBEM090001882025

Filing Number

109/2025

Filing Date

18-Jan-2025

Registration No

84/2025

Registration Date

18-Jan-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Contai, Purba Medinipur

Judge

3-ADJ Ftc I

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED IN EXPARTE

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1)(ia)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT ANJALI JANA MAL

    Adv. TAPAN PAYRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BISWAJIT MAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted an ex-parte divorce decree to the wife under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on grounds of cruelty. The respondent-husband failed to appear for cross-examination despite filing a written statement and ultimately admitted he had no objection to divorce, which the court treated as an admission that he was unwilling to perform matrimonial obligations. The petitioner's unchallenged testimony regarding physical and mental torture, including dowry demands and domestic violence, was accepted as proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Ftc I

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    P.H

    ADJ Ftc I

  5. 20-Nov-2025

    P.H

    ADJ Ftc I

  6. 30-Jul-2025

    Show Cause

    ADJ Ftc I

  7. 03-Jun-2025

    Issues

    ADJ Ftc I

  8. 24-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    ADJ Ftc I

  9. 18-Jan-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  10. 18-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 18-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 84/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted an ex-parte divorce decree to the wife under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on grounds of cruelty. The respondent-husband failed to appear for cross-examination despite filing a written statement and ultimately admitted he had no objection to divorce, which the court treated as an admission that he was unwilling to perform matrimonial obligations. The petitioner's unchallenged testimony regarding physical and mental torture, including dowry demands and domestic violence, was accepted as proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case