STATE OF WESTBENGAL . vs AMIT PRAMANIK — 1216/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBEM080018532018
Filing Number
1853/2018
Filing Date
16-07-2018
Registration No
1216/2018
Registration Date
16-07-2018
Court
Additiona Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia, Purba Medinipur
Judge
3-ACJM
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WESTBENGAL .
Adv. Mr. Gopal Chandra Das
Respondent(s)
AMIT PRAMANIK
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ACJM
Disposed
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C |
| 27-02-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C |
| 24-02-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C |
| 25-08-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Amit Pramanik (1216/2018) The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia acquitted Amit Pramanik of charges under Section 363 IPC (abduction of a minor) due to insufficient prosecution evidence. Though the complainant alleged his daughter was abducted on 25.03.2018, the victim herself testified she voluntarily went to a relative's house without informing parents after being scolded about studies, contradicting the abduction claim. The court found the prosecution's case lacked corroborating evidence and noted both complainant and victim had no allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Amit Pramanik (1216/2018) The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia acquitted Amit Pramanik of charges under Section 363 IPC (abduction of a minor) due to insufficient prosecution evidence. Though the complainant alleged his daughter was abducted on 25.03.2018, the victim herself testified she voluntarily went to a relative's house without informing parents after being scolded about studies, contradicting the abduction claim. The court found the prosecution's case lacked corroborating evidence and noted both complainant and victim had no allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts