state of west Bengal vs Billa Pada Balida — 1387/2016
Case under I.p.c(police) Section 341/186/188/506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th May 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBEM080001062015
Filing Number
9371/2016
Filing Date
28-Apr-2015
Registration No
1387/2016
Registration Date
28-Apr-2015
Court
Additiona Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia, Purba Medinipur
Judge
3-Acjm
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.state of west Bengal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Billa Pada Balida
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Copy of JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia acquitted Billapada Balida of charges under IPC Sections 341/186/188/506, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant alleged the accused prevented WBSETCL workers from trimming trees on his land on 24.04.2015, but prosecution witnesses provided inconsistent testimony with no corroborating evidence, and the court also noted the case's 11-year pendency violated the accused's right to speedy trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Acjm
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Acjm
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
Acjm II
-
03-Jul-2024
Evidence
Acjm
-
03-Oct-2023
Evidence
Acjm
-
13-Mar-2023
Evidence
Acjm
-
28-Nov-2022
Evidence
Acjm
-
14-Mar-2022
Evidence
Acjm
-
07-Jul-2021
Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Sep-2020
Evidence
Acjm II
-
13-Mar-2020
Evidence
Acjm II
-
25-Jun-2019
Evidence
Acjm II
-
29-Oct-2018
Evidence
Acjm
-
25-Apr-2018
Evidence
Acjm
-
07-Sep-2017
Evidence
Acjm
-
15-Feb-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 1387/2016
Case Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia acquitted Billapada Balida of charges under IPC Sections 341/186/188/506, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant alleged the accused prevented WBSETCL workers from trimming trees on his land on 24.04.2015, but prosecution witnesses provided inconsistent testimony with no corroborating evidence, and the court also noted the case's 11-year pendency violated the accused's right to speedy trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts