UTTAM KUMAR DAS vs SHACHINANDAN PANDIT AND 1 — 40/2021
Case under West Bengal Land Reforms Act Section 8,9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
Misc Case (pre-emption)
CNR: WBEM070004172021
Filing Number
416/2021
Filing Date
24-Dec-2021
Registration No
40/2021
Registration Date
24-Dec-2021
Court
Civil Judge Jr. Divn. Haldia, Purba Medinipur
Judge
5-Civil Judge Jr Div
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UTTAM KUMAR DAS
Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Sankar Gantait
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHACHINANDAN PANDIT AND 1
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
22-May-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
01-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
25-Jul-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
16-May-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
21-Mar-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
20-Jan-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
12-Oct-2023
P.H
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
20-Jul-2023
P.H
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
19-May-2023
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case 40/2021 Summary The Civil Judge (Jr. Divn), Haldia rejected the local inspection petition filed by the Opposite Party (Shachinandan Pandit) on 10.05.2022 under Order 39 Rule 7 of CPC. The court held that the O.P.'s claim of possessing a specific, well-demarcated portion can be proven through evidence at trial and does not warrant local inspection, as granting it would amount to collecting evidence prematurely. The case is adjourned to 20.07.2023 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2023
P.H
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
09-Mar-2023
Written Statement and Written Objection
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
24-Feb-2023
Written Statement and Written Objection
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
28-Nov-2022
Written Statement and Written Objection
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
08-Sep-2022
Written Statement and Written Objection
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
25-Jul-2022
Written Statement and Written Objection
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
03-Jun-2022
Written Statement and Written Objection
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
09-Mar-2022
Written Statement and Written Objection
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
04-Feb-2022
Written Statement and Written Objection
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
24-Dec-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Dec-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2021
Case 40/2021 Summary The Civil Judge (Jr. Divn), Haldia rejected the local inspection petition filed by the Opposite Party (Shachinandan Pandit) on 10.05.2022 under Order 39 Rule 7 of CPC. The court held that the O.P.'s claim of possessing a specific, well-demarcated portion can be proven through evidence at trial and does not warrant local inspection, as granting it would amount to collecting evidence prematurely. The case is adjourned to 20.07.2023 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts