SUDIPTA RAUL vs THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER , P.W.D AND 11 — 119/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 03rd September 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: WBEM070001792022
Filing Number
176/2022
Filing Date
19-Apr-2022
Registration No
119/2022
Registration Date
19-Apr-2022
Court
Civil Judge Jr. Divn. Haldia, Purba Medinipur
Judge
5-Civil Judge Jr Div
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUDIPTA RAUL
Adv. SAMARESH BERA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER , P.W.D AND 11
Case History
-
03-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
16-Sep-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
17-Apr-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
16-Dec-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
16-Jul-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
04-Mar-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
30-Aug-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
28-Apr-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
03-Dec-2022
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
08-Sep-2022
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
03-Aug-2022
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
02-Jul-2022
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
21-Apr-2022
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: In civil suit C.I.S./T.S 119 of 2022, the court refused the plaintiff's prayer for ad interim injunction relief under CPC Order 39, Rule 1 & 2, finding no urgency or risk of irreparable loss. However, the court allowed the plaintiff's petition for local inspection and appointed Advocate Aloke Mallick as commissioner to conduct the inspection after both parties receive notice. The plaintiff is directed to pay Rs. 1,200/- as commissioner's fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2022
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
19-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 119/2022
Summary: In civil suit C.I.S./T.S 119 of 2022, the court refused the plaintiff's prayer for ad interim injunction relief under CPC Order 39, Rule 1 & 2, finding no urgency or risk of irreparable loss. However, the court allowed the plaintiff's petition for local inspection and appointed Advocate Aloke Mallick as commissioner to conduct the inspection after both parties receive notice. The plaintiff is directed to pay Rs. 1,200/- as commissioner's fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts