State Govt. vs SAMIR KUMAR DAS AND 3 ORS. — 3/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 79,351(2),3(5),POCSO12. Status: E.R.of W/A. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

E.R.of W/A Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spcl Case(Pocso Act)

CNR: WBEM050000462026

Filing Number

26/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Haldia, Purba Medinipur

Judge

1-ADJ

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 79,351(2),3(5),POCSO12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Govt.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAMIR KUMAR DAS AND 3 ORS.

  2. 2.MANAS CHAKRABORTY

  3. 3.SANTANU CHAKRABORTY

  4. 4.SOURAV CHAKRABORTY

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: POCSO 03/2026 Bail petition filed by accused Santanu Chakraborty and Sourav Chakraborty was rejected on 20.04.2026. The court found that the accused had previously violated bail conditions by entering prohibited jurisdiction, threatening the complainant and victim, and tampering with evidence. The court determined that releasing them on bail posed a strong likelihood of case proceedings being protracted or hampered. Case adjourned to 04-06-2026 for production of accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    E.R.of W/A

    ADJ

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Production

    ADJ

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Production

    ADJ

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: POCSO 03/2026 Bail petition filed by accused Santanu Chakraborty and Sourav Chakraborty was rejected on 20.04.2026. The court found that the accused had previously violated bail conditions by entering prohibited jurisdiction, threatening the complainant and victim, and tampering with evidence. The court determined that releasing them on bail posed a strong likelihood of case proceedings being protracted or hampered. Case adjourned to 04-06-2026 for production of accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case