Anima Maity and 03 others vs Anish Majumder and another — 747/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: S/R. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

S/R Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M A C C - M.A.C.C

CNR: WBEM010079132024

Filing Number

2135/2024

Filing Date

06-Dec-2024

Registration No

747/2024

Registration Date

06-Dec-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anima Maity and 03 others

    Adv. Biswajit Adhikary

  2. 2.Somnath Maity

  3. 3.Sandip Maity

  4. 4.Manasi Maity Manna

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anish Majumder and another

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: In MACC No. 747 of 2025 before the District Judge of Purba Medinipur, the case was adjourned to 10.06.2026 for S/R (Submission of Report) of O.P. No. 2. The adjournment was granted in the interest of justice, citing the Regular P.O.'s involvement in an ongoing SIR project as per Supreme Court and High Court directions, and in view of the Local Bar Associations' Resolution dated 07.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    S/R

    District Judge

  4. 21-Nov-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 21-Nov-2025

    S/R

    District Judge

  6. 13-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 13-Aug-2025

    Apperance

    District Judge

  8. 17-May-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  9. 17-May-2025

    Apperance

    District Judge

  10. 16-Jan-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  11. 16-Jan-2025

    Apperance

    District Judge

  12. 06-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 06-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 747/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In MACC No. 747 of 2025 before the District Judge of Purba Medinipur, the case was adjourned to 10.06.2026 for S/R (Submission of Report) of O.P. No. 2. The adjournment was granted in the interest of justice, citing the Regular P.O.'s involvement in an ongoing SIR project as per Supreme Court and High Court directions, and in view of the Local Bar Associations' Resolution dated 07.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case