Archana Ghosh vs Saroj Kumar Bhuyan and another — 494/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M A C C - M.A.C.C

CNR: WBEM010057582024

Filing Number

1445/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

494/2024

Registration Date

06-Aug-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk

Judge

5-ADJ Ftc II

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Archana Ghosh

    Adv. BAISHAKHI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saroj Kumar Bhuyan and another

  2. 2.National Insurance Co Ltd

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ Ftc II

  3. 28-Nov-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ Ftc II

  4. 25-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Adjourned. In MACC No. 494 of 2024 before the MACT, Tamluk, the case was adjourned to 28.11.2025 for submission of written arguments and additional documents (S/R and A/D) from Opposite Party No. 1, and for Opposite Party No. 2 (Insurance Company) to appear with proper authorization (vakalatnama), as their petition was filed without proper legal representation documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 25-Aug-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ Ftc II

  6. 16-May-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 16-May-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ Ftc II

  8. 31-Jan-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  9. 31-Jan-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ Ftc II

  10. 12-Sep-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ Ftc II

  11. 06-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 494/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned. In MACC No. 494 of 2024 before the MACT, Tamluk, the case was adjourned to 28.11.2025 for submission of written arguments and additional documents (S/R and A/D) from Opposite Party No. 1, and for Opposite Party No. 2 (Insurance Company) to appear with proper authorization (vakalatnama), as their petition was filed without proper legal representation documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case