Madhusudan Das and 02 others vs Prasenjit Barai and another — 887/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: S/R and A/D. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
M A C C - M.A.C.C
CNR: WBEM010056802022
Filing Number
2049/2022
Filing Date
14-Dec-2022
Registration No
887/2022
Registration Date
14-Dec-2022
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk
Judge
3-ADJ II
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Madhusudan Das and 02 others
Adv. AMAL KUMAR MAJI
-
2.Lakshmi Das
-
3.Mantu Panja
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prasenjit Barai and another
-
2.National Insurance Co Ltd
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case MACC 887/2022 - Summary: The case has been adjourned to 10.06.26 for S/R (Settlement/Recording) and A/D (Arguments/Decision). No steps were taken by either party during today's hearing, and the regular Presiding Officer was unavailable for SIR duty. The adjournment was made in accordance with the District Bar Association's resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
S/R and A/D
ADJ II
-
19-Sep-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
S/R and A/D
ADJ II
-
24-Jun-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
24-Jun-2025
Show Cause
ADJ II
-
04-Apr-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
04-Apr-2025
Filing Requisites
ADJ II
-
05-Feb-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
05-Feb-2025
Filing Requisites
ADJ III
-
21-Aug-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
21-Aug-2024
Filing Requisites
ADJ II
-
07-May-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
07-May-2024
Steps
ADJ II
-
19-Dec-2023
Filing Requisites
ADJ II
-
04-Aug-2023
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
04-Aug-2023
Filing Requisites
ADJ II
-
29-Mar-2023
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
29-Mar-2023
Filing Requisites
ADJ II
-
14-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 887/2022
Case MACC 887/2022 - Summary: The case has been adjourned to 10.06.26 for S/R (Settlement/Recording) and A/D (Arguments/Decision). No steps were taken by either party during today's hearing, and the regular Presiding Officer was unavailable for SIR duty. The adjournment was made in accordance with the District Bar Association's resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts