Rokeya Khan Bibi vs Samrat Singha Shee — 522/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 500. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBEM010048332024

Filing Number

2601/2024

Filing Date

26-Jun-2024

Registration No

522/2024

Registration Date

26-Jun-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 500

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rokeya Khan Bibi

    Adv. SURAJIT MAITY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Samrat Singha Shee

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected the petitioner's Section 408 Cr.P.C application for lack of prosecution, as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared despite repeated calls on the hearing date. The case was disposed of, with the court noting it cannot function as a post office for absent parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge

  10. 04-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  11. 04-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge

  12. 13-May-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  13. 13-May-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge

  14. 28-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge

  15. 05-Dec-2024

    Apperance

    District Judge

  16. 11-Nov-2024

    Apperance

    District Judge

  17. 04-Sep-2024

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  18. 04-Sep-2024

    S/R

    District Judge

  19. 26-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 26-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 522/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the petitioner's Section 408 Cr.P.C application for lack of prosecution, as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared despite repeated calls on the hearing date. The case was disposed of, with the court noting it cannot function as a post office for absent parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case