Prasenjit Sarkar alise Prasenjit Sarkar vs State of West Bengal — 241/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th April 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBEM010012322026
Filing Number
726/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
241/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
94
Police Station
PURBA MEDINIPUR PANSKURA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prasenjit Sarkar alise Prasenjit Sarkar
Adv. PALASH PATTANAYAK
Respondent(s)
State of West Bengal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Purba Medinipur rejected the anticipatory bail application of Prasenjit Sarkar in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2), 61(2), 3(5) and the Arms Act. Although the petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and not connected to the alleged incident (which primarily involved accused Sintu Senapati), the court found that money had been transferred to the petitioner's account from the complainant's account, and considered the nature and gravity of the offence along with statements recorded during investigation, leading to the rejection of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Purba Medinipur rejected the anticipatory bail application of Prasenjit Sarkar in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2), 61(2), 3(5) and the Arms Act. Although the petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and not connected to the alleged incident (which primarily involved accused Sintu Senapati), the court found that money had been transferred to the petitioner's account from the complainant's account, and considered the nature and gravity of the offence along with statements recorded during investigation, leading to the rejection of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts