Samaresh Paul and 04 others vs State of West Bengal — 240/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBEM010012312026
Filing Number
725/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
240/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
148
Police Station
PURBA MEDINIPUR TAMLUK
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Samaresh Paul and 04 others
Adv. RAJKUMAR MAITI
-
2.Suman Pal @ Suman Chandra Pal
-
3.Radharani Pal
-
4.Banshibadan Pal
-
5.Shefali Pal
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 240/2026 The Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for Samaresh Paul due to credible evidence he caused a grievous fracture injury to the complainant's wife with a wooden bat, but granted anticipatory bail to the four other accused (Suman Pal, Radharani Pal, Banshibadan Pal, and Shefali Pal) as materials on record showed no justification for their custodial interrogation. The four granted bail must execute bonds of Rs. 3,000 each and surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 240/2026
Case Summary: 240/2026 The Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for Samaresh Paul due to credible evidence he caused a grievous fracture injury to the complainant's wife with a wooden bat, but granted anticipatory bail to the four other accused (Suman Pal, Radharani Pal, Banshibadan Pal, and Shefali Pal) as materials on record showed no justification for their custodial interrogation. The four granted bail must execute bonds of Rs. 3,000 each and surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts