State of West Bengal vs Debkumar Das — 236/2025

Case under Electricity Act Section 135(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Electricity Act

CNR: WBEM010010352025

e-Filing Number

05-03-2025

Filing Number

629/2025

Filing Date

05-Mar-2025

Registration No

236/2025

Registration Date

05-Mar-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

120

Police Station

PURBA MEDINIPUR EGRA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 135(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Debkumar Das

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Debkumar Das (236/2025) Debkumar Das was convicted under Section 135(1)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (as amended 2007) for dishonestly consuming electricity by direct hooking from an LTOH line, causing revenue loss to WBSEDCL. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily; the court accepted his plea and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 and imprisonment for 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Put Up

    ADJ I

  7. 05-Mar-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  8. 05-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 236/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Debkumar Das (236/2025) Debkumar Das was convicted under Section 135(1)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (as amended 2007) for dishonestly consuming electricity by direct hooking from an LTOH line, causing revenue loss to WBSEDCL. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily; the court accepted his plea and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 and imprisonment for 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case