Gopal Adhikary vs State of West Bengal — 187/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--NOT PRESSED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBEM010009902026

Filing Number

564/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

187/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--NOT PRESSED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gopal Adhikary

    Adv. KAUSTABH KANTI JANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Purba Medinipur rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Gopal Adhikary under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with Tamluk P.S. Case No. 1027/2022 involving charges under Sections 420/406/409 I.P.C. (fraud, criminal breach of trust, and criminal misconduct). The rejection was on the ground that the accused's advocate withdrew the application by filing another petition requesting not to press it further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Put Up

    District Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Purba Medinipur rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Gopal Adhikary under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with Tamluk P.S. Case No. 1027/2022 involving charges under Sections 420/406/409 I.P.C. (fraud, criminal breach of trust, and criminal misconduct). The rejection was on the ground that the accused's advocate withdrew the application by filing another petition requesting not to press it further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case