Rosnara Bibi and 02 others vs State of West Bengal — 185/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBEM010009882026

Filing Number

562/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

185/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

387

Police Station

PURBA MEDINIPUR CHANDIPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rosnara Bibi and 02 others

    Adv. DIPANKAR MANNA

  2. 2.Hosnara Khatun

  3. 3.Sahajadi Bibi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    Case Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of three accused sisters-in-law (Rosnara Bibi, Hosnara Khatun, and Shahajadi Bibi) charged under sections 80/85 BNS and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act for the death of a young woman through torture. Despite the defense claiming false implication and prolonged detention since February 18, 2026, the court found prima facie involvement and refused bail, citing the serious nature of allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 185/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of three accused sisters-in-law (Rosnara Bibi, Hosnara Khatun, and Shahajadi Bibi) charged under sections 80/85 BNS and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act for the death of a young woman through torture. Despite the defense claiming false implication and prolonged detention since February 18, 2026, the court found prima facie involvement and refused bail, citing the serious nature of allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case