Satyajit Mondal vs Smt. Arpita Acharya Mondal — 8/2026

Case under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFER on 20th February 2026.

Case disposed

Act Viii Miscellaneous Case

CNR: WBEM010009162026

Filing Number

390/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Tamluk

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

20-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--TRANSFER

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Satyajit Mondal

    Adv. Santimoy Jana

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Arpita Acharya Mondal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 8/2026 (Satyajit Mondal v. Arpita Acharya Mondal): Satyajit Mondal filed applications for custody and guardianship of a minor child under Sections 8 and 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act 1890. The District Judge of Purba Medinipur registered the case and transferred it to the Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Contai for disposal, as the minor child resides in Contai's jurisdiction. The petitioner was directed to appear before the transferee court on 23.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 8/2026 (Satyajit Mondal v. Arpita Acharya Mondal): Satyajit Mondal filed applications for custody and guardianship of a minor child under Sections 8 and 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act 1890. The District Judge of Purba Medinipur registered the case and transferred it to the Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Contai for disposal, as the minor child resides in Contai's jurisdiction. The petitioner was directed to appear before the transferee court on 23.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case