State of West Bengal GR 96/24 vs SRIBASH SAHA — 326/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281/125(b),106(1). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th April 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBDJ050005262024

Case disposed

Filing Number

456/2024

Filing Date

22-11-2024

Registration No

326/2024

Registration Date

06-12-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurseong, Darjeeling

Judge

2-ACJM

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

94

Police Station

KURSEONG

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281/125(b),106(1)

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal GR 96/24

Adv. L.D APP

Respondent(s)

SRIBASH SAHA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM

10-04-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Evidence

16-02-2026

Evidence

18-12-2025

Evidence

04-11-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Final Order
10-04-2026
Judgment

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurseong acquitted Sribash Saha of charges under Sections 281/125(b)/324(4)/106(1) of BNS in a fatal road accident case. The court found that despite examining twelve prosecution witnesses, none established that the accused drove the offending vehicle in a rash or negligent manner causing the death; no witness could identify who was driving the scooter or provide critical vehicle details, resulting in failure to prove the essential elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

12-12-2024
Daily Order
21-02-2025
Daily Order
26-03-2025
Daily Order
14-05-2025
Daily Order
23-06-2025
Daily Order
04-11-2025
Daily Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurseong acquitted Sribash Saha of charges under Sections 281/125(b)/324(4)/106(1) of BNS in a fatal road accident case. The court found that despite examining twelve prosecution witnesses, none established that the accused drove the offending vehicle in a rash or negligent manner causing the death; no witness could identify who was driving the scooter or provide critical vehicle details, resulting in failure to prove the essential elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurseong, Darjeeling All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case