PRENA MANGER vs SATYABRATA CHETTRI — 25/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EXPARTE on 20th April 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBDJ040001512025
Filing Number
66/2025
Filing Date
07-Nov-2025
Registration No
25/2025
Registration Date
12-Nov-2025
Court
Additional District Judge, Kurseong, Darjeeling
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EXPARTE
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRENA MANGER
Adv. PRABIN CHANDRA PRADHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.SATYABRATA CHETTRI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Final OrderView PDF
The Additional District Judge at Kurseong granted an ex-parte divorce decree to petitioner Prena Manger against respondent Satyabrata Chettri under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged testimony credible, accepting her claims of cruelty, behavioral changes, infidelity, financial harassment, and physical assault by the respondent since their marriage in January 2015, which forced her to leave the matrimonial home in April 2017 with their minor son. The marriage was dissolved effective from the date of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ
-
24-Mar-2026
Daily OrderView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Exparte Hearing
ADJ
-
12-Mar-2026
Daily OrderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Exparte Hearing
ADJ
-
24-Feb-2026
Daily OrderView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Exparte Hearing
ADJ
-
03-Feb-2026
Exparte Hearing
ADJ
-
09-Dec-2025
Daily OrderView PDF
-
09-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 25/2025
The Additional District Judge at Kurseong granted an ex-parte divorce decree to petitioner Prena Manger against respondent Satyabrata Chettri under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged testimony credible, accepting her claims of cruelty, behavioral changes, infidelity, financial harassment, and physical assault by the respondent since their marriage in January 2015, which forced her to leave the matrimonial home in April 2017 with their minor son. The marriage was dissolved effective from the date of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts