GASHU LAMA vs PAYWONG TAMANG Advocate - PRAYESH TAMANG — 22/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13b. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

Divorce On Mutual Consent - Matri Suit Divorce Mutual Cons

CNR: WBDJ040001322025

Filing Number

57/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

22/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Kurseong, Darjeeling

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13b

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GASHU LAMA

    Adv. ADARSH LAMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAYWONG TAMANG Advocate - PRAYESH TAMANG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Additional District Judge, Kurseong granted a decree of divorce on mutual consent between Smt. Gashu Lama and Shri Paywong Tamang under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court found that both parties voluntarily preferred the suit with no disputes, having lived separately since March 2023 due to irreconcilable differences, and that all requirements for mutual consent divorce were satisfied with no collusion or undue influence. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Daily OrderView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  6. 03-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge, Kurseong granted a decree of divorce on mutual consent between Smt. Gashu Lama and Shri Paywong Tamang under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court found that both parties voluntarily preferred the suit with no disputes, having lived separately since March 2023 due to irreconcilable differences, and that all requirements for mutual consent divorce were satisfied with no collusion or undue influence. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case