State of West Bengal vs Subodh Thakur — 208/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBDJ020022272025
Filing Number
2226/2025
Filing Date
23-Sep-2025
Registration No
208/2025
Registration Date
24-Sep-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling
Judge
5-CJM
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Adv. Pankaj Prasad
Respondent(s)
-
1.Subodh Thakur
-
2.Sanjay Thakur
-
3.Mina Thakur
-
4.Laxmi Thakur
-
5.Jagnarayan Thakur
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of the JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Subodh Thakur & Others (208/2025) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling acquitted Subodh Thakur, Mina Thakur, Sanjay Thakur, Laxmi Thakur, and Jaganarayan Thakur of dowry harassment charges under IPC Section 498A. The complainant (PW1) made serious allegations in the FIR but retracted them entirely during testimony, stating the case was filed due to misunderstanding and expressing no objection to acquittal, creating reasonable doubt about the allegations' veracity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Charge
CJM
-
12-Feb-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Er/Wa
CJM
-
11-Feb-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Appearance
CJM
-
09-Dec-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
09-Dec-2025
Appearance
CJM
-
30-Oct-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
30-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 208/2025
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Subodh Thakur & Others (208/2025) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling acquitted Subodh Thakur, Mina Thakur, Sanjay Thakur, Laxmi Thakur, and Jaganarayan Thakur of dowry harassment charges under IPC Section 498A. The complainant (PW1) made serious allegations in the FIR but retracted them entirely during testimony, stating the case was filed due to misunderstanding and expressing no objection to acquittal, creating reasonable doubt about the allegations' veracity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts