State of West Bengal vs Pujan Mangar alice Thapa — 164/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,82,351. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 29th May 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBDJ020021712025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2170/2025

Filing Date

07-08-2025

Registration No

164/2025

Registration Date

08-08-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling

Judge

5-CJM

Decision Date

29th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,82,351

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. Pankaj Prasad

Respondent(s)

Pujan Mangar alice Thapa

Hearing History

Judge: 5-CJM

29-05-2026

Disposed

26-05-2026

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

28-04-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

12-12-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

29-05-2026
Copy of Order
29-05-2026
Copy of the Judgment

Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Pujan Mangar (Reg. 164/2025) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling acquitted accused Pujan Mangar of charges under sections 85 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), finding insufficient evidence of mental and physical cruelty. The complainant (wife) testified about assault, threats, extramarital affairs, and borrowed money, but crucially admitted during cross-examination that she filed the case "due to monetary dispute," fundamentally undermining her credibility. The three corroborating witnesses provided no direct knowledge of the alleged conduct. The court determined the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, lacking medical evidence, corroborating documents, or trustworthy evidence to support the domestic cruelty allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-10-2025
Copy of Order
12-12-2025
Copy of Order
13-03-2026
Copy of Order
28-04-2026
Copy of Order
26-05-2026
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Pujan Mangar (Reg. 164/2025) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling acquitted accused Pujan Mangar of charges under sections 85 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), finding insufficient evidence of mental and physical cruelty. The complainant (wife) testified about assault, threats, extramarital affairs, and borrowed money, but crucially admitted during cross-examination that she filed the case "due to monetary dispute," fundamentally undermining her credibility. The three corroborating witnesses provided no direct knowledge of the alleged conduct. The court determined the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, lacking medical evidence, corroborating documents, or trustworthy evidence to support the domestic cruelty allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case