State of West Bengal vs N Vasudeva — 147/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 78(2),79. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBDJ020021212025
Filing Number
2120/2025
Filing Date
16-Jul-2025
Registration No
147/2025
Registration Date
19-Jul-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling
Judge
5-CJM
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
DARJEELING SADAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Adv. Pankaj Prasad
Respondent(s)
-
1.N Vasudeva
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of the JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling acquitted N. Vasudeva of charges under Sections 78(2)/79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for allegedly recording a woman's video without consent. The court found that the sole victim failed to identify the accused despite standing in the dock, and the prosecution could not prove mala fide intent or establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the accused was merely a tourist capturing natural beauty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
CJM
-
11-Dec-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
CJM
-
10-Oct-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
CJM
-
27-Aug-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
27-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 147/2025
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling acquitted N. Vasudeva of charges under Sections 78(2)/79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for allegedly recording a woman's video without consent. The court found that the sole victim failed to identify the accused despite standing in the dock, and the prosecution could not prove mala fide intent or establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the accused was merely a tourist capturing natural beauty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts