Smt Salina Subba vs Shri Raju Lohar — 5/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Mr Maintenance - MR case for Maintenance

CNR: WBDJ020016562025

Filing Number

1656/2025

Filing Date

09-Apr-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

09-Apr-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling

Judge

5-CJM

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISE

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt Salina Subba

    Adv. Prena Thakuri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri Raju Lohar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 5/2025 Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling allowed Smt Salina Subba's maintenance petition under Section 144 BNSS on a consensual settlement. Although the petitioner initially sought ₹15,000/month, both parties agreed to ₹7,000/month, which the court found fair and reasonable given the respondent's financial capacity (₹25,000 monthly salary) and the petitioner's unemployment and financial hardship. The respondent is directed to pay ₹7,000 monthly by the 7th of each month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    CJM

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Steps

    CJM

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  9. 13-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Report

    CJM

  10. 02-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Report

    CJM

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    Written Objection

    CJM

  12. 09-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    CJM

  13. 08-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 09-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 5/2025 Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darjeeling allowed Smt Salina Subba's maintenance petition under Section 144 BNSS on a consensual settlement. Although the petitioner initially sought ₹15,000/month, both parties agreed to ₹7,000/month, which the court found fair and reasonable given the respondent's financial capacity (₹25,000 monthly salary) and the petitioner's unemployment and financial hardship. The respondent is directed to pay ₹7,000 monthly by the 7th of each month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case