BARSHA SARKAR vs UJJWAL SARKAR — 123/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 16th April 2026.
Mr Maintenance - MR case for Maintenance
CNR: WBDD060045642024
Filing Number
4564/2024
Filing Date
06-Nov-2024
Registration No
123/2024
Registration Date
06-Nov-2024
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buniadpur
Judge
4-Jm
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BARSHA SARKAR
Adv. AMIT KUMAR SARKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.UJJWAL SARKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Barsha Sarkar v. Ujjwal Sarkar (123/2024) The Judicial Magistrate granted Barsha Sarkar's maintenance petition ex parte under Section 144 BNSS, finding she is the legally wedded wife of Ujjwal Sarkar, living separately and unable to maintain herself. The court ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 3,000 monthly maintenance (though petitioner claimed Rs. 20,000), effective from the filing date, based on the respondent's sufficient means (5/7 Bighas property and monthly income of Rs. 20,000-40,000) and the petitioner's destitute status following dowry-related harassment and eviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Jm
-
23-Dec-2025
Order
Jm
-
23-Sep-2025
Argument / Further Argument
Jm
-
27-Aug-2025
Hearing
Jm
-
18-Jul-2025
Hearing
Jm
-
19-May-2025
Order
Jm
-
17-Apr-2025
Exparte Hearing
Jm
-
28-Feb-2025
Exparte Hearing
Jm
-
15-Jan-2025
Exparte Hearing
Jm
-
06-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 123/2024
Case Summary: Barsha Sarkar v. Ujjwal Sarkar (123/2024) The Judicial Magistrate granted Barsha Sarkar's maintenance petition ex parte under Section 144 BNSS, finding she is the legally wedded wife of Ujjwal Sarkar, living separately and unable to maintain herself. The court ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 3,000 monthly maintenance (though petitioner claimed Rs. 20,000), effective from the filing date, based on the respondent's sufficient means (5/7 Bighas property and monthly income of Rs. 20,000-40,000) and the petitioner's destitute status following dowry-related harassment and eviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts