West Bengal Goverment vs JUEL SARKAR AND THREE OTHERS — 194/2023

Case under Arms Act Section 25(i)(a),27,35. Status: Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: WBDD010018822023

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

Next Hearing

14th July 2026

Filing Number

1269/2023

Filing Date

18-07-2023

Registration No

194/2023

Registration Date

18-07-2023

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat

Judge

1-District Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

338

Police Station

TAPAN

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(i)(a),27,35
Explosive Substances Act Section 4(b),5w

Petitioner(s)

West Bengal Goverment

Adv. P.P

Respondent(s)

JUEL SARKAR AND THREE OTHERS

ARIF SARKAR

HARIDAS MANDAL

GANESH SINGH @BHURKUNDI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

15-05-2026

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

13-03-2026

Further Evidence

30-01-2026

Further Evidence

05-12-2025

Further Evidence

28-10-2025

Further Evidence

Interim Orders

19-07-2023
Order
24-07-2023
Order
16-09-2023
Order
11-10-2023
Order
05-02-2024
Order
12-04-2024
Order
12-07-2024
Order
08-11-2024
Order
31-01-2025
Order
08-04-2025
Order
09-04-2025
Order
10-04-2025
Order
17-06-2025
Order
18-06-2025
Order
19-06-2025
Order
06-08-2025
Order
07-08-2025
Order
27-10-2025
Order
28-10-2025
Order
05-12-2025
Order
30-01-2026
Order
13-03-2026
Order
15-05-2026
Order

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 194/2023 Outcome: Case adjourned to 14.07.2026. The court examined SI Nirupam Das as PW-9 and discharged him after cross-examination. Advocate's petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C. to represent absent accused Haridas Mandal was allowed. Case fixed for examination of all four accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. on the next date; prosecution directed to adduce evidence regarding the D.M.'s sanction order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 194/2023 Outcome: Case adjourned to 14.07.2026. The court examined SI Nirupam Das as PW-9 and discharged him after cross-examination. Advocate's petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C. to represent absent accused Haridas Mandal was allowed. Case fixed for examination of all four accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. on the next date; prosecution directed to adduce evidence regarding the D.M.'s sanction order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case