BIBHAS BARMAN vs SHILPI SUTRADHAR — 273/2025

Case under Special Marriage Act Section 28. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed on mutual consent on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBDD010018542025

Filing Number

480/2025

Filing Date

02-Sep-2025

Registration No

273/2025

Registration Date

02-Sep-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed on mutual consent

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Special Marriage Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIBHAS BARMAN

    Adv. SUBHANKAR KARMAKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHILPI SUTRADHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Case Summary: 273/2025 - Bibhas Barman v. Shilpi Sutradhar The Additional District Judge at Balurghat granted a decree of mutual divorce to Bibhas Barman and Shilpi Sutradhar under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The court found that both parties satisfied the statutory requirements: they had been living separately for over one year (since April 20, 2023), were unable to cohabit due to incompatibility and bitterness, and mutually consented to dissolution. The court upheld the parties' decisional autonomy, noting that once spouses mutually agree to end their marriage, law should not interfere. Their marriage, registered on February 28, 2023, stands dissolved from the date of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Reconcilation

    ADJ I

  5. 02-Sep-2025

    Order

  6. 02-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 273/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 273/2025 - Bibhas Barman v. Shilpi Sutradhar The Additional District Judge at Balurghat granted a decree of mutual divorce to Bibhas Barman and Shilpi Sutradhar under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The court found that both parties satisfied the statutory requirements: they had been living separately for over one year (since April 20, 2023), were unable to cohabit due to incompatibility and bitterness, and mutually consented to dissolution. The court upheld the parties' decisional autonomy, noting that once spouses mutually agree to end their marriage, law should not interfere. Their marriage, registered on February 28, 2023, stands dissolved from the date of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case