Amrita Dutta vs Prodip Kumar Dutta Advocate - Monotosh Tokdar, Amit Deb — 2/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order9,rule13. Status: O.P.W. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
Misc Case DJ
CNR: WBDD010005142017
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
97/2017
Filing Date
28-02-2017
Registration No
2/2017
Registration Date
28-02-2017
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat
Judge
1-District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amrita Dutta
Adv. Gadadhar Basak
Respondent(s)
Prodip Kumar Dutta Advocate - Monotosh Tokdar, Amit Deb
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
O.P.W
O.P.W
O.P.W
O.P.W
O.P.W
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | O.P.W |
| 13-03-2026 | O.P.W |
| 31-01-2026 | O.P.W |
| 22-12-2025 | O.P.W |
| 10-11-2025 | O.P.W |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In this matrimonial miscellaneous case pending since 2017, the petitioner (Amrita Dutta) completed her evidence with two witnesses by August 2025. The respondent (Prodip Kumar Dutta) repeatedly delayed presenting his evidence despite multiple adjournments. The court noted that the respondent filed an affidavit on 31.01.2026 but failed to tender it or produce his witness for cross-examination. The court directed the respondent to appear on 10.06.2026 to present his evidence; failing which, the respondent's evidence will be closed and the case will proceed to arguments. A cost of Rs. 1,000 was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In this matrimonial miscellaneous case pending since 2017, the petitioner (Amrita Dutta) completed her evidence with two witnesses by August 2025. The respondent (Prodip Kumar Dutta) repeatedly delayed presenting his evidence despite multiple adjournments. The court noted that the respondent filed an affidavit on 31.01.2026 but failed to tender it or produce his witness for cross-examination. The court directed the respondent to appear on 10.06.2026 to present his evidence; failing which, the respondent's evidence will be closed and the case will proceed to arguments. A cost of Rs. 1,000 was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts