PIYALI SARKAR vs WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P. — 165/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--NOT PRESS on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc Case

CNR: WBDD010004852026

Filing Number

356/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

165/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--NOT PRESS

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

145

Police Station

BALURGHAT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PIYALI SARKAR

    Adv. SUBHAJIT KUMAR DUTTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 165/2026 The Sessions Court of Dakshin Dinajpur rejected the bail petition filed by accused Piyali Sarkar under Section 482 of BNSS after her advocate withdrew the application, stating he did not wish to press it. The criminal miscellaneous case was consequently disposed of without substantive adjudication on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Put Up

    District Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 165/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 165/2026 The Sessions Court of Dakshin Dinajpur rejected the bail petition filed by accused Piyali Sarkar under Section 482 of BNSS after her advocate withdrew the application, stating he did not wish to press it. The criminal miscellaneous case was consequently disposed of without substantive adjudication on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case