SAIDUL ISLAM vs WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P. — 164/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc Case

CNR: WBDD010004842026

Filing Number

355/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

164/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

GANGARAMPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAIDUL ISLAM

    Adv. SHASWATA CHAKI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 164/2026 Summary: The Sessions Court rejected Saidul Islam's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS in a case involving charges under Section 69 BNS (sexual intercourse by false promise of marriage). The court found prima facie sufficient materials against the accused-petitioner, a constable who allegedly developed a physical relationship with a divorced woman through false marriage promises, blackmailed her with intimate videos, coerced further relations, and extorted ₹3,00,000. The court determined the investigation had collected adequate evidence to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 164/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 164/2026 Summary: The Sessions Court rejected Saidul Islam's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS in a case involving charges under Section 69 BNS (sexual intercourse by false promise of marriage). The court found prima facie sufficient materials against the accused-petitioner, a constable who allegedly developed a physical relationship with a divorced woman through false marriage promises, blackmailed her with intimate videos, coerced further relations, and extorted ₹3,00,000. The court determined the investigation had collected adequate evidence to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case