JYOTISH ROY AND ANOTHER vs WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P. — 162/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
Criminal Misc Case
CNR: WBDD010004822026
Filing Number
353/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
162/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
128
Police Station
GANGARAMPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JYOTISH ROY AND ANOTHER
Adv. UMAR FARUK ISLAM
-
2.MITHUN ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused-petitioners Jyotish Roy and Mithun Roy under Section 482 BNSS. The court found prima facie evidence that the petitioners assisted a third accused in committing the alleged offense, with injury reports documenting a 6 cm cut injury on the victim's head caused by a bamboo lathi, thereby invoking Section 3(5) BNS for abetment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 162/2026
The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused-petitioners Jyotish Roy and Mithun Roy under Section 482 BNSS. The court found prima facie evidence that the petitioners assisted a third accused in committing the alleged offense, with injury reports documenting a 6 cm cut injury on the victim's head caused by a bamboo lathi, thereby invoking Section 3(5) BNS for abetment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts