SUBHAGYA SARKAR AND 02 ORS vs WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P. — 161/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc Case

CNR: WBDD010004812026

Filing Number

352/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

161/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

152

Police Station

BALURGHAT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHAGYA SARKAR AND 02 ORS

    Adv. NIRBAN KAR

  2. 2.MAMPI SARKAR

  3. 3.DIPALI SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: The Court of Sessions Judge, Dakshin Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to accused-petitioners Subhagya Sarkar, Mampi Sarkar, and Dipali Sarkar. The court found insufficient evidence against them in a case arising from a quarrel at a marriage ceremony over mobile photography. The court held that custodial interrogation was unnecessary and allowed bail on execution of bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 161/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Court of Sessions Judge, Dakshin Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to accused-petitioners Subhagya Sarkar, Mampi Sarkar, and Dipali Sarkar. The court found insufficient evidence against them in a case arising from a quarrel at a marriage ceremony over mobile photography. The court held that custodial interrogation was unnecessary and allowed bail on execution of bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case