RAFIKUL ISLAM AND 06 ORS vs WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P. — 142/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc Case

CNR: WBDD010004262026

Filing Number

308/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

KUSHMUNDI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAFIKUL ISLAM AND 06 ORS

    Adv. UMAR FARUK ISLAM

  2. 2.MAJIBUR RAHAMAN

  3. 3.WASIM AKRAM

  4. 4.ILIYIAS ALI

  5. 5.JAFRUL ISLAM

  6. 6.MIJANUR RAHAMAN

  7. 7.ENAMUL ISLAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 142/2026 The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by seven accused petitioners (Rafikul Islam, Majibur Rahaman, Wasim Akram, and four others) in a case involving alleged criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found direct involvement of the accused based on case materials including seizure of an iron rod and medical evidence showing a hairline fracture to the victim's skull requiring six stitches. The application was dismissed considering the investigation stage and available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 142/2026 The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by seven accused petitioners (Rafikul Islam, Majibur Rahaman, Wasim Akram, and four others) in a case involving alleged criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found direct involvement of the accused based on case materials including seizure of an iron rod and medical evidence showing a hairline fracture to the victim's skull requiring six stitches. The application was dismissed considering the investigation stage and available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case