ROJINA KHATUN AND ANOTHER vs WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P. — 136/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Criminal Misc Case

CNR: WBDD010004052026

Case disposed

Filing Number

295/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

136/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

HARIRAMPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

ROJINA KHATUN AND ANOTHER

Adv. UMAR FARUK ISLAM

BADIR SEKH

Respondent(s)

WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

13-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 136/2026 The Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused-petitioners Rojina Khatun and Badir Sekh under Section 482 BNSS. The court found direct allegations against the petitioners in the case diary regarding charges under Sections 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, and 303(2) BNS. The case involved conflicting narratives between the petitioner (alleging rape) and the accused's wife (lodging a counter-case), but the court determined sufficient material evidence existed against the accused to reject bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 136/2026 The Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused-petitioners Rojina Khatun and Badir Sekh under Section 482 BNSS. The court found direct allegations against the petitioners in the case diary regarding charges under Sections 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, and 303(2) BNS. The case involved conflicting narratives between the petitioner (alleging rape) and the accused's wife (lodging a counter-case), but the court determined sufficient material evidence existed against the accused to reject bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case