MALLIKA DAS AND 02 ORS vs WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P. — 134/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 19th March 2026.
Criminal Misc Case
CNR: WBDD010004032026
Filing Number
293/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
134/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 30-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
112
Police Station
GANGARAMPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MALLIKA DAS AND 02 ORS
Adv. BIKASH MOHANTA
-
2.PRIYA DAS
-
3.JHARNA RABIDAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT Advocate - P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 134/2026 The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Mallika Das, Priya Das, and Jharna Rabidas under Section 482 BNSS. The court found sufficient materials against the petitioners, who allegedly jointly assaulted the victim Pinaki Ranjan Das with an iron rod and shabol, leaving him critically injured in ICU with poor prognosis. Since the investigation was still at a nascent stage and counter-cases were pending over the same dispute, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 134/2026
Case Summary: 134/2026 The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Mallika Das, Priya Das, and Jharna Rabidas under Section 482 BNSS. The court found sufficient materials against the petitioners, who allegedly jointly assaulted the victim Pinaki Ranjan Das with an iron rod and shabol, leaving him critically injured in ICU with poor prognosis. Since the investigation was still at a nascent stage and counter-cases were pending over the same dispute, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts