West Bengal Goverment vs BABUSONA MALI AND SEVEN OTHERS — 45/2025
Case under Arms Act Section 25(1)(a),25(1B),(a),27(1),35. Status: Charge / Plea Hearing. Next hearing: 25th August 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBDD010001562025
Filing Number
122/2025
Filing Date
10-Jan-2020
Registration No
45/2025
Registration Date
15-Sep-2022
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Balurghat
Judge
2-ADJ I
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0
Police Station
HILI
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.West Bengal Goverment
Respondent(s)
-
1.BABUSONA MALI AND SEVEN OTHERS
-
2.BIKI DAS
-
3.MAJNU MONDAL
-
4.DILWAR MONDAL
-
5.NITAI MAHANTA
-
6.HARISH ROY
-
7.UTPAL MONDAL
-
8.SUBRATA ROY
Case History
-
25-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Jun-2026
OrderView PDF
In Sessions Case 45/2025 before the Additional District & Sessions Judge at Balurghat, the court allowed an adjournment request as a final opportunity for one absent accused person. The hearing was postponed to 25/08/2026 for consideration of charges, with all accused persons required to remain present. The court warned that no further adjournments would be permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Charge / Plea Hearing
ADJ I
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Charge / Plea Hearing
ADJ I
-
15-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
15-Jan-2026
Charge / Plea Hearing
ADJ I
-
31-Oct-2025
OrderView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
Appearence
ADJ I
-
16-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
Appearence
ADJ I
-
11-Apr-2025
OrderView PDF
-
11-Apr-2025
Appearence
ADJ I
-
04-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
-
04-Mar-2025
Appearence
District Judge
-
18-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
-
18-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2025
In Sessions Case 45/2025 before the Additional District & Sessions Judge at Balurghat, the court allowed an adjournment request as a final opportunity for one absent accused person. The hearing was postponed to 25/08/2026 for consideration of charges, with all accused persons required to remain present. The court warned that no further adjournments would be permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts