KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION vs HABIBUR RAHMAN — 88/2025

Case under The Calcutta Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1955 Section 401(A). Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 06th March 2026 Date Not Updated.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 06-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Gr Case

CNR: WBCS030001232025

Filing Number

123/2025

Filing Date

09-Jul-2025

Registration No

88/2025

Registration Date

09-Jul-2025

Court

Municipal Magistrates Court, Calcutta

Judge

1-Senior Municipal Magistrate

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Calcutta Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1955 Section 401(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HABIBUR RAHMAN

  2. 2.BHUTTU RAHMAN

  3. 3.MD. AZAD

Case History

  1. 06-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 31-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Adjourned. In GR Case No. 88 of 2025 (State vs. Habibur Rahaman and others), the Senior Municipal Magistrate, Kolkata adjourned the case to 06-03-2026 for appearance of accused nos. 1 and 3, as they were absent by petition seeking adjournment. The court also directed BC-II to issue a warrant of arrest (W/A) against accused no. 2 immediately, as it had not yet been issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Jan-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Senior Municipal Magistrate

  4. 15-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  5. 15-Nov-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Senior Municipal Magistrate

  6. 20-Sep-2025

    OrderView PDF

  7. 20-Sep-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Senior Municipal Magistrate

  8. 18-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

  9. 18-Aug-2025

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

    Senior Municipal Magistrate

  10. 09-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 09-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned. In GR Case No. 88 of 2025 (State vs. Habibur Rahaman and others), the Senior Municipal Magistrate, Kolkata adjourned the case to 06-03-2026 for appearance of accused nos. 1 and 3, as they were absent by petition seeking adjournment. The court also directed BC-II to issue a warrant of arrest (W/A) against accused no. 2 immediately, as it had not yet been issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case