L AND T FINANCE LIMITED. vs YERLA DUBBA VENKATI — 216990/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(3),318,316(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Withdrawn on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CS - COMPLAINT CASE (SOUTH)

CNR: WBCS022340682025

Filing Number

330529/2025

Filing Date

30-Jun-2025

Registration No

216990/2025

Registration Date

01-Aug-2025

Court

Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta

Judge

3-3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Withdrawn

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(3),318,316(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LIMITED.

    Adv. SNIGDHA DUTTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YERLA DUBBA VENKATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Calcutta J.M. 3rd Court dismissed the case between L and T Finance Limited and Yerla Dubba Venkati after the complainant company's authorized representative filed a petition to compound the case under Section 320 CrPC/359 BNSS, testifying that the dispute had been amicably settled. The court granted permission to compound and acquitted the accused person(s), finding no impediment since the offences were compoundable with court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    E/R Of Warrent

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 216990/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta J.M. 3rd Court dismissed the case between L and T Finance Limited and Yerla Dubba Venkati after the complainant company's authorized representative filed a petition to compound the case under Section 320 CrPC/359 BNSS, testifying that the dispute had been amicably settled. The court granted permission to compound and acquitted the accused person(s), finding no impediment since the offences were compoundable with court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case