MRS. NIDHI JHAWAR vs M/S. BHUANIA RETAILS PRIVATE LIMITED — 45657/2021

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: For Cross Examination. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

For Cross Examination Next hearing 07-May-2026 this date has passed

CS - COMPLAINT CASE (SOUTH)

CNR: WBCS020474422021

Filing Number

47308/2021

Filing Date

07-Aug-2021

Registration No

45657/2021

Registration Date

07-Aug-2021

Court

Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta

Judge

3-3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

Last updated 14-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRS. NIDHI JHAWAR

    Adv. RAHUL AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. BHUANIA RETAILS PRIVATE LIMITED

  2. 2.MR. BISWAJIT BANERJEE

  3. 3.MR. CHANDAN PRASAD

Case History

  1. 07-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    For Cross Examination

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  3. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  5. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  6. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  7. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  8. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  9. 27-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  10. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  11. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  12. 19-Sep-2024

    OrderView PDF

  13. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  14. 22-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  15. 13-May-2024

    Final OrderView PDF

    The complaint has been withdrawn under Section 257 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The complainant's lawyer filed a petition for withdrawal after the dispute was amicably settled out of court, and the court permitted the withdrawal after examining the complainant in open court and verifying the authenticity of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 13-May-2024

    Evidence

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  17. 10-Apr-2024

    For Appearance

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  18. 27-Feb-2024

    For Appearance

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  19. 07-Dec-2023

    Steps

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  20. 11-Oct-2023

    Plea

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  21. 30-Sep-2023

    Plea

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  22. 25-Sep-2023

    For Production

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  23. 21-Aug-2023

    For Production

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  24. 20-Jul-2023

    E/R Of Warrent

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  25. 02-Jun-2023

    For Proclamation

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  26. 21-Apr-2023

    For Proclamation

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  27. 07-Mar-2023

    For Proclamation

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  28. 07-Feb-2023

    E/R Of Warrent

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  29. 10-Jan-2023

    E/R Of Warrent

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  30. 18-Oct-2022

    E/R Of Warrent

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  31. 10-Aug-2022

    For Appearance

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  32. 06-Jun-2022

    For Appearance

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  33. 05-May-2022

    Plea

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  34. 04-Apr-2022

    Plea

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  35. 29-Jan-2022

    Plea

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  36. 24-Jan-2022

    For Appearance

    3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .

  37. 28-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 07-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45657/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The complaint has been withdrawn under Section 257 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The complainant's lawyer filed a petition for withdrawal after the dispute was amicably settled out of court, and the court permitted the withdrawal after examining the complainant in open court and verifying the authenticity of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case