ELA BHATTACHARYYA vs PAJ CONSTRUCTIONS — 30239/2015
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Plea. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
CS - COMPLAINT CASE (SOUTH)
CNR: WBCS020300892015
Filing Number
36578/2015
Filing Date
23-Sep-2015
Registration No
30239/2015
Registration Date
23-Sep-2015
Court
Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta
Judge
3-3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ELA BHATTACHARYYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PAJ CONSTRUCTIONS
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Plea
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
13-Oct-2025
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
16-May-2025
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
06-Feb-2025
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
07-Nov-2024
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
24-Jun-2024
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
16-May-2024
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
02-Apr-2024
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
01-Mar-2024
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
09-Feb-2024
Hearing
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
05-Jan-2024
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
07-Nov-2023
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
07-Oct-2023
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
18-Aug-2023
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
07-Aug-2023
OrderView PDF
Case Summary (30239/2015): Bail was granted to accused no.2 Soumen S. Roy on 07.08.2023 by the 3rd Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta. The accused was required to furnish bail of Rs. 2,000 with one registered surety of equal amount and directed to appear on 18.08.2023. Any pending warrant against the accused was recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Aug-2023
For Appearance
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
28-Jun-2023
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
02-Mar-2023
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
31-Oct-2022
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
18-Aug-2022
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
06-May-2022
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
24-Mar-2022
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
14-Jan-2022
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
16-Nov-2021
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
02-Jul-2021
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
16-Apr-2021
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
17-Nov-2020
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
12-May-2020
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
26-Feb-2020
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
17-Jan-2020
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
18-Dec-2019
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
16-Nov-2019
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
30-Sep-2019
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
30-Aug-2019
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
03-Jul-2019
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
15-May-2019
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
02-Apr-2019
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
07-Feb-2019
For Cross Examination
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
05-Jan-2019
Evidence
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
02-Nov-2018
Evidence
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
14-Sep-2018
Evidence
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
31-May-2018
Evidence
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
14-Feb-2018
Evidence
-
23-Oct-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 30239/2015
Case Summary (30239/2015): Bail was granted to accused no.2 Soumen S. Roy on 07.08.2023 by the 3rd Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta. The accused was required to furnish bail of Rs. 2,000 with one registered surety of equal amount and directed to appear on 18.08.2023. Any pending warrant against the accused was recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts