MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs TAPAN KUMAR MAHATA — 20062/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Withdrawn on 31st March 2026.
CS - COMPLAINT CASE (SOUTH)
CNR: WBCS020227082024
Filing Number
22692/2024
Filing Date
07-Feb-2024
Registration No
20062/2024
Registration Date
22-Feb-2024
Court
Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta
Judge
3-3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Withdrawn
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED
Adv. SAYAK RANJAN GANGULY
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAPAN KUMAR MAHATA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Final OrderView PDF
The court permitted withdrawal of the complaint filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited against Tapan Kumar Mahata under Section 280 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, as the parties had amicably settled the dispute out of court. The court examined the complainant in open court, confirmed the authenticity of the withdrawal application, and found no impediment to granting the withdrawal request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Disposed
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
12-Mar-2026
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
12-Nov-2025
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
10-Jul-2025
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
10-Apr-2025
E/R Of Warrent
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
19-Dec-2024
Plea
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
12-Aug-2024
Plea
3 Rd. Metropolitan Magistrate .
-
27-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 20062/2024
The court permitted withdrawal of the complaint filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited against Tapan Kumar Mahata under Section 280 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, as the parties had amicably settled the dispute out of court. The court examined the complainant in open court, confirmed the authenticity of the withdrawal application, and found no impediment to granting the withdrawal request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts